<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheapside cross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/cheapside-cross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/cheapside-cross/</link>
	<description>A blog (mostly) about early modern culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mercuriuspoliticus</title>
		<link>http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/cheapside-cross/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>mercuriuspoliticus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/?p=156#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Well, I wouldn&#039;t have looked unless you&#039;d done the hard work of finding out about the pamphlets! I think you&#039;re right, the woodcut is a CCTV caught in the act equivalent of the damage being done. 

There&#039;s also another nice image of vandals, this time appropriately labelled with their various sects, in a 1641 pamphlet which also has crosses speaking - this time it&#039;s the Cheapside and Charing crosses talking to each other. (See update in post above for the image).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t have looked unless you&#8217;d done the hard work of finding out about the pamphlets! I think you&#8217;re right, the woodcut is a CCTV caught in the act equivalent of the damage being done. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also another nice image of vandals, this time appropriately labelled with their various sects, in a 1641 pamphlet which also has crosses speaking &#8211; this time it&#8217;s the Cheapside and Charing crosses talking to each other. (See update in post above for the image).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royjb</title>
		<link>http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/cheapside-cross/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>royjb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/?p=156#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Ah, well done, Mercurius. As you see, I have finally bestirred myself to sign on to comment on Wordpress; I also ought to bestir myself to do some proper research into the pamphlets I so casually write about - well, thanks for sweeping up the mess! No surprise at all if John Taylor is involved - London (check), politics (check), pamphlet dispute (check). The woodcut shows the very moment of iconoclasm, doesn&#039;t it, with the intrepid vandal up on the spiked rails?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, well done, Mercurius. As you see, I have finally bestirred myself to sign on to comment on WordPress; I also ought to bestir myself to do some proper research into the pamphlets I so casually write about &#8211; well, thanks for sweeping up the mess! No surprise at all if John Taylor is involved &#8211; London (check), politics (check), pamphlet dispute (check). The woodcut shows the very moment of iconoclasm, doesn&#8217;t it, with the intrepid vandal up on the spiked rails?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
