<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to irritate a puritan: an introductory reading list</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/how-to-irritate-a-puritan-an-introductory-reading-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/how-to-irritate-a-puritan-an-introductory-reading-list/</link>
	<description>A blog (mostly) about early modern culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:53:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Investigations of a Dog &#187; Bosoms!</title>
		<link>http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/how-to-irritate-a-puritan-an-introductory-reading-list/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Investigations of a Dog &#187; Bosoms!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/?p=656#comment-314</guid>
		<description>[...] of she-devil toilet sex, while Ovid&#8217;s Ars Amatoria was one of the things guranteed to irritate a puritan. In Agnes Bowker&#8217;s Cat David Cressy dated the first picture of an erect penis in English [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of she-devil toilet sex, while Ovid&#8217;s Ars Amatoria was one of the things guranteed to irritate a puritan. In Agnes Bowker&#8217;s Cat David Cressy dated the first picture of an erect penis in English [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/how-to-irritate-a-puritan-an-introductory-reading-list/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercuriuspoliticus.wordpress.com/?p=656#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Great post; one of my favourite aspects of historical research is following threads from one source that lead you down fascinating (though occasionally tortuous) paths. Is it possible the disapproval of Heywood&#039;s work was compounded by his courtly connections? I&#039;m familiar with him - currently not familiar enough - as the writer of &#039;A true description of his Majesties royall and most stately ship&#039; (London, 1638) explaining, in both prose and poetry, the decorations of the Sovereign of the Seas, Charles&#039; magnificent but impractical three-decker warship. I think I read somewhere that he was also the artist who designed the same decorations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post; one of my favourite aspects of historical research is following threads from one source that lead you down fascinating (though occasionally tortuous) paths. Is it possible the disapproval of Heywood&#8217;s work was compounded by his courtly connections? I&#8217;m familiar with him &#8211; currently not familiar enough &#8211; as the writer of &#8216;A true description of his Majesties royall and most stately ship&#8217; (London, 1638) explaining, in both prose and poetry, the decorations of the Sovereign of the Seas, Charles&#8217; magnificent but impractical three-decker warship. I think I read somewhere that he was also the artist who designed the same decorations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
